Skip to main content

The English Civil War

This should go down in the annals of history as one of the most successful fifth column attacks by an outside power on a country

Until the 1970s England had an ancient population and culture (see   The origins of the English) and with the disappearance of the British Empire this population believed that it was "the British".  This native population misjudged the sheer depth of class hatred in the old British governing classes.  The experience of governing an Empire meant that the British governing classes knew exactly what to do to combat the industrial unrest of the 1970s.  If the natives are restless you import millions of people from overseas to remove the impact of the restless population.  They did this in Sri Lanka, Northern Ireland, the Caribbean etc. and began the same change in England so starting the second, bloodless, Civil War.  They won this war, thoroughly trouncing the English.


As in any civil war the lower class faction were led by a group of defectors from the upper classes who despised their own background (see The roots of New Labour ) and were separate from the lower classes.   In other civil wars this separation between the leaders and the masses has allowed the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of people without guilt.  The recent civil war was bloodless but just as ruthless.

In this latest civil war the leaders of the English had their own agenda and by historical standards they were traitors.  As Jon Cruddas, the Labour policy chief, recently said on BBC Newsnight: in the 1980s half the party wanted the police to be disbanded and the Russians invited to govern the country. When the Soviet Empire collapsed the leaders of the English lower classes were thrown into confusion, their ideals had gone  The only way they could express their hatred and treachery was to join the British governing classes in the hope of creating anarchy.

In 1997 the New Labour Party began a deliberate policy of the final destruction of the English people. They massively accelerated the import of foreign labour and by 2010 the original English were a minority in their own capital (See London is no longer "white British").   The battle had been won by the British, London, the heart and powerhouse of the country, was no longer English.  The original English had been removed.  The new electorate, the imported population, need no encouragement to believe this is a good thing - you don't want to live in a country that some minority group thinks that they, and their children, "own"!

The moral of this story is that hatred generally brings disaster.  The English lower classes hated those tainted with the accent of the British to such a degree that they were fooled by the brilliant tactics of their enemy and even at the last continue to support the Labour party because they speak mockney.  The upper classes played a blinder, they controlled the media and education and overwhelmed their enemy with soft power.  Thatcher's government began the dissolution of English worker power but Blair and Brown were maestros.  Brown and Blair truly hated the ordinary English.

The British government now have the population that any Imperial Government desires.  They can divide and rule and will not face any rising of the New British for several generations at least.

Do I care?  Well, the English had it coming.  They needed to be put out of their misery.  They kept asking for action on immigration, on the importation of foreign labour, but did not realise that they could vote on this at every election.  All they needed to do was kick out the Labour and Tory parties.  It was obvious to everyone that the continual influx of people was changing the country irreversibly and stressing every part of the system.  So the English deserve no sympathy.  I feel slightly sorry for the children of the English, even the New British can look to other countries for their culture but the children of the English are like aborigines, with no special rights over their own land and their original tribal power just a memory.  But as the British will tell you, this is racism.  The law is clear, any group, such as the English, that lays claim to preferential treatment and rights for themselves or their children in this land is racist.

What of the British governing classes?  They may have won a Pyrrhic victory because the strength of the Anglo-Normans lay historically in  being able to call on the cultural strength of the English and this is now gone.  Perhaps they will make the transition to being part of the ruling class of the new European Empire.

England itself has serious problems.  The British have told them to pride themselves on being without a single culture and "anti racist" but all of the rest of the world is strongly nationalist and discriminatory.   The techniques used to extinguish the English will not serve the British well in the world at large because they are deliberately destructive. However, these techniques are now being used elsewhere, the Chinese have been particularly successful using them in Tibet, first replacing Tibetans in the cities and then in the country as a whole.


Some quotes:

William Hague: "English nationalism is the most dangerous of all forms of nationalism that can arise within the United Kingdom, because England is five-sixths of the population of the UK."

Jack Straw the English are:  "potentially very aggressive, very violent"

Roll of Dishonour* - The Traitors

Jack Jones - TUC General Secretary and KGB Agent
Tony Blair - protege of Jack Jones
Jack Straw - self confessed Stalinist
John Reid - Communist
Peter Hain - Marxist and SWP sympathiser
Peter Mandelson - Communist
Charles Clarke - Trained in Cuba
Alistair Darling - International Marxist Group
Alan Johnson - Communist
Charlie Whelan (Brown's advisor) - Communist
Stephen Byers - International Socialist
Alan Milburn - Marxist

Harry Pollitt, leader of the Communist Party of Great Britain, told them: 'Don't join us. Work hard, get good degrees, join the Establishment and serve our cause from within.'

They did, they subverted the Labour Party and they destroyed all before them.

*Although I have used the term "Roll of Dishonour" these people played an absolute blinder, England had resisted invasion, rapid change and dissolution for a millennium and these people entirely changed it from within in a decade, even educating the children to believe that this was a great achievement.  It is only the idiot English who supported them without question who were truly dishonourable. This should go down in the annals of history as one of the most successful fifth column attacks by an outside power on a country.  Amazing, well done KGB and Soviet Union!  It is a shame for these revolutionaries that Thatcher broke international communism before they could cash in - though they would have probably all have been shot by the Soviets anyway.  Modern governments should watch out for the aftereffects - the communists operated by appointing each other to key posts and sticking together, this is the perfect way to subvert a business, university or media organisation - being posh they knew about the "old school tie" and used the method for their own advancement.

Postscript

This article was written in 2013. Since then the EU Referendum has been won by the Leave campaign and the UK appears to be embarking on a new age where the migrant populations might, with luck, be integrated into a new population.  This new population has the chance to create a new culture and vibrant economy.  However, the House of Lords has recently introduced amendments to Brexit to give 3 million EU migrants citizenship. This may provide the voter numbers to finally destroy the UK and absorb it into the EU, the hope being to destroy the English forever.

POLITICAL THOUGHTS click here to see the whole POLITICAL THOUGHTS magazine POLITICAL THOUGHTS!

22/2/2013

See

The origins of the English

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome